<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
<channel>
<title>GioBlog</title>
<description>Various musings by Tom Giovanetti, all-around nice guy (if a bit of an over-serious geek)</description>
<link>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/gioblog.nsf/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:12:11 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<title>The political significance of Obama&#8217;s Rev. Wright problem</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:12:11 -0500</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
Here's what I think is the political significance of Obama's "Rev. Wright problem." <br /> <br />As far as most voters are concerned: <br /> <br />-If Obama was aware of Rev. Wright's views and implicitly endorse them through church membership, attendance and giving, Obama is too radical to be president. <br /> <br />-If Obama was aware of Rev. Wright's views and didn't think they were problem enough to change churches over, Obama doesn't have good enough judgment to be president. <br /> <br />-If Obama was aware of Rev. Wright's views and is trying to finesse the issue to preserve his political viability, Obama is too dishonest to be president. <br /> <br />-If Obama attended Rev. Wright's church for 20 years and wasn't aware of Wright's positions, Obama is <span style="text-decoration:line-through">too stupid</span> not observant enough to be president. <br /> <br /> ...
 ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/the-political-significance-of-obamas-rev.-wright-problem.htm</link>
<category>Politics</category>
<dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/the-political-significance-of-obamas-rev.-wright-problem.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/the-political-significance-of-obamas-rev.-wright-problem.htm</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Here's what I think is the political significance of Obama's "Rev. Wright problem." <br /> <br />As far as most voters are concerned: <br /> <br />-If Obama was aware of Rev. Wright's views and implicitly endorse them through church membership, attendance and giving, Obama is too radical to be president. <br /> <br />-If Obama was aware of Rev. Wright's views and didn't think they were problem enough to change churches over, Obama doesn't have good enough judgment to be president. <br /> <br />-If Obama was aware of Rev. Wright's views and is trying to finesse the issue to preserve his political viability, Obama is too dishonest to be president. <br /> <br />-If Obama attended Rev. Wright's church for 20 years and wasn't aware of Wright's positions, Obama is <span style="text-decoration:line-through">too stupid</span> not observant enough to be president. <br /> <br />Clearly, Obama choose to attend a large black church pastored by a radical pastor because it enhanced his local political viability.  <br /> <br />But in the presidential campaign, Obama has been trying to sell himself as a "different kind of" black leader. He's succeeded wildly at this positioning move, but the Rev. Wright problem has revealed that, if Obama isn't just another radical black liberal, he certainly spends his time with them. <br /> <br />And the mainstream voters who have been attracted to Obama as a symbol aren't down with the radical agenda Obama is now, for the first time, associated with. ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dxcomments/the-political-significance-of-obamas-rev.-wright-problem.htm</wfw:commentRss>
<wfw:comment> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/the-political-significance-of-obamas-rev.-wright-problem.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment>
</item>
<item>
<title>Why do Cowboys abandon the run down 4 points with plenty of time?</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:04:58 -0500</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
My greatest frustration about the Cowboy's unnecessary loss to Philadelphia yesterday is this: Why did the Cowboys abandon the running game only down 4 points with half a game left to play? The Cowboys attempted only 15 rushes the entire game. But Marion Barber averaged 4.6 yards per carry for his ...
 ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/why-do-cowboys-abandon-the-run-down-4-points-with-plenty-of-time.htm</link>
<category>Sports</category>
<dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/why-do-cowboys-abandon-the-run-down-4-points-with-plenty-of-time.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/why-do-cowboys-abandon-the-run-down-4-points-with-plenty-of-time.htm</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ My greatest frustration about the Cowboy's unnecessary loss to Philadelphia yesterday is this: Why did the Cowboys abandon the running game only down 4 points with half a game left to play? <br /> <br />The Cowboys attempted only 15 rushes the entire game. But Marion Barber averaged 4.6 yards per carry for his 7 carries. Shouldn't Barber have been handed the ball a few more times, especially only down 4 points and Romo obviously having a horrible day throwing the ball and with a hurt throwing thumb? <br /> <br />Lots of accolades have been heaped upon Dallas offensive coordinator Jason Garrett this year, and rightly so. But Garrett called a clunker yesterday. ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dxcomments/why-do-cowboys-abandon-the-run-down-4-points-with-plenty-of-time.htm</wfw:commentRss>
<wfw:comment> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/why-do-cowboys-abandon-the-run-down-4-points-with-plenty-of-time.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment>
</item>
<item>
<title>Patriot fans are certifiably insane</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:46:11 -0500</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
I knew there was something wrong with Patriot fans. Now we know. ...
 ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/patriot-fans-are-certifiably-insane.htm</link>
<category>Sports</category>
<dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/patriot-fans-are-certifiably-insane.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/patriot-fans-are-certifiably-insane.htm</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ I knew there was something wrong with Patriot fans. <a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/wcStory?contentId=6534058&amp;storyNumber=4&amp;MSNHPHMA"><strong>Now we know.</strong></a> ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dxcomments/patriot-fans-are-certifiably-insane.htm</wfw:commentRss>
<wfw:comment> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/patriot-fans-are-certifiably-insane.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment>
</item>
<item>
<title>Anglicans must be proud</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:50:01 -0500</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
References to Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, head of the world's Anglican community, came across my desk several times this weekend. I hope Anglicans are proud. First, of course, is Rowan Williams attacking U.S. foreign policy, glossing over British imperialism, and doing all of this in ...
 ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/anglicans-must-be-proud.htm</link>
<category>Current Events</category>
<dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/anglicans-must-be-proud.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/anglicans-must-be-proud.htm</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ References to Archbishop of Canterbury <strong>Rowan</strong> Williams, head of the world's Anglican community, came across my desk several times this weekend. <br /> <br />I hope Anglicans are proud. <br /> <br />First, of course, is Rowan Williams <a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSL2517836620071125><strong>attacking U.S. foreign policy, glossing over British imperialism</strong></a>, and doing all of this in an interview with a Muslim magazine <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=OTliNzFlYzk0YWE2OTk5MjU1MWI0NWVhMjc5Nzk0NDI="><strong>without apparently having any problems with Muslim foreign policy.</strong></a> <br /> <br />Second, in my research on the Golden Compass movie and its controversy, we find that the Philip Pullman novels, which are written by an aggressive atheist as an attack not only on theism but also as an attack on and a counterpoint to C.S. Lewis' Narnia novels, are widely recognized by Christians as an attack on their faith (and on theism in general), <a href=http://www.hisdarkmaterials.org/srafopedia/index.php/Philip_Pullman><strong>but Rowan Williams has no problem with them.</strong></a> <br /> <br /><blockquote>However, Pullman has found support from other Christians, most notably <a href="http://www.hisdarkmaterials.org/srafopedia/index.php?title=Rowan_Williams&amp;action=edit">Rowan Williams</a>, the <a href="http://www.hisdarkmaterials.org/srafopedia/index.php?title=Archbishop_of_Canterbury&amp;action=edit">Archbishop of Canterbury</a>. These groups and individuals point out that Pullman's attacks are focused on the constraints of <a href=http://www.hisdarkmaterials.org/srafopedia/index.php/Dogma>dogmatism</a> and the use of religion to oppress, not Christianity itself. Dr. Williams has gone so far as to propose that <a href=http://www.hisdarkmaterials.org/srafopedia/index.php/His_Dark_Materials><em>His Dark Materials</em></a> be taught as part of <a href="http://www.hisdarkmaterials.org/srafopedia/index.php?title=Religious_education&amp;action=edit">religious education</a> in schools.</blockquote> <br />Imagine--the author himself acknowledges the novels as an attack on Christianity, and Christians around the globe recognize them as such, but the Archbishop of Canterbury thinks they're great. <br /> <br />The final novel features a battle to pull down and destroy God--and Rowan Williams has no problem with that. <br /> <br />I hope you Anglicans are proud. <br /> <br />We have a guy in the U.S. named Barry Lynn, or more accurately the <a href="http://www.au.org/site/PageServer?pagename=aboutau"><strong>Rev. Barry W. Lynn</strong></a>. Anytime anyone is looking for a supposedly religious person to say something critical of Christians, or traditional Christian values, they can always count on the Rev. Lynn. <br /> <br />Apparently, Rowan Williams is aspiring to give Barry Lynn some competition in the field of religious leaders who can be counted on to actually stand against almost everything religious people believe. ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dxcomments/anglicans-must-be-proud.htm</wfw:commentRss>
<wfw:comment> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/anglicans-must-be-proud.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rio de Janeiro travelogue-1</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 02:57:32 -0200</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
Some non-policy photos from my trip to Rio de Janeiro for the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) Nov. 12-16, 2007. The view from my window at the Intercontinental Hotel Rio: ...
 ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/rio-de-janeiro-travelogue-1.htm</link>
<category>Photos</category>
<dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/rio-de-janeiro-travelogue-1.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/rio-de-janeiro-travelogue-1.htm</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Some non-policy photos from my trip to Rio de Janeiro for the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) Nov. 12-16, 2007. <br /> <br /> The view from my window at the Intercontinental Hotel Rio: ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dxcomments/rio-de-janeiro-travelogue-1.htm</wfw:commentRss>
<wfw:comment> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/rio-de-janeiro-travelogue-1.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment>
</item>
<item>
<title>Op/ed in DC Examiner, &quot;A Tale of Two Climates&quot;</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:07:33 -0500</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
IPI President Tom Giovanetti's lastest oped, "<a href="http://www.examiner.com/a-994752~A_tale_of_two_climates.html"><strong><span style="text-decoration:underline">A Tale of Two Climates" </span></strong></a> is featured in the DC Examiner<strong>.</strong> <br /> <br /> In the piece, Giovanetti goes against the grain of global warming doomsdayers to discuss how climate change may actually have economic benefits for all mankind. <br />  ...
 ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/tom-giovanetti-featured-in-dc-examiner-a-tale-of-two-climates
.htm</link>
<category>Economic Growth</category>
<dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/tom-giovanetti-featured-in-dc-examiner-a-tale-of-two-climates
.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/tom-giovanetti-featured-in-dc-examiner-a-tale-of-two-climates
.htm</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ I had an op/ed on global warming, <a href="http://www.examiner.com/a-994752~A_tale_of_two_climates.html"><strong><span style="text-decoration:underline">"A Tale of Two Climates"</span></strong></a> in the DC Examiner a few days ago.<br /> <br /> An excerpt: <br /> <blockquote>"...So why it is considered a global catastrophe now that the glaciers are receding, and the land is being freed? Are we, like the people displaced by the glaciers, captive to the arrogance of the status quo? Do we assume that the conditions that exist during our lifetimes are the way things always have been, and the way things always should be? <br /> <br /> Or is it possible that we, like they, simply happen to live during a climate tipping point, where the results of immutable climate cycles are simply becoming manifest? <br /> <br /> Why do we assume that having massive amounts of the earth's surface covered in a thick sheet of ice is a good thing? We're accustomed to seeing glacier-filled valleys and snow-covered mountains, but is that necessarily the ideal state of the earth? <br /> <br /> Is it better for Greenland to be green, or to be covered in an ice sheet? Is it better for Canada's northernmost territory to be useless, or productive?"</blockquote> <br /> <br /> Visit the<a href="http://www.examiner.com/a-994752~A_tale_of_two_climates.html"><strong><span style="text-decoration:underline"> DC Examiner</span></strong></a> to read the full article.  ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dxcomments/tom-giovanetti-featured-in-dc-examiner-a-tale-of-two-climates
.htm</wfw:commentRss>
<wfw:comment> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/tom-giovanetti-featured-in-dc-examiner-a-tale-of-two-climates
.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment>
</item>
<item>
<title>Right on the Bears, we&#8217;ll see about the rest of the Cowboys schedule</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 23:21:45 +0200</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
Well, I was right about the Cowboys vs. the Bears, though I didn't get to enjoy the game because I'm overseas and didn't see a single play. Groan. Still think my evaluation of Dallas and my predictions are on-track. To recap: But a team with a good quarterback will pick the Dallas secondary apart ...
 ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/right-on-the-bears-well-see-about-the-rest-of-the-cowboys-schedule.htm</link>
<category>Sports</category>
<dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/right-on-the-bears-well-see-about-the-rest-of-the-cowboys-schedule.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/right-on-the-bears-well-see-about-the-rest-of-the-cowboys-schedule.htm</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Well, I was right about the Cowboys vs. the Bears, though I didn't get to enjoy the game because I'm overseas and didn't see a single play. <br /> <br />Groan. <br /> <br />Still think my evaluation of Dallas and my predictions are on-track. To recap: <br /> <br /><blockquote>But a team with a good quarterback will pick the Dallas secondary apart. And that means 6 teams the Cowboys will face. <br /> <br /> Tom Brady will pick the Cowboys secondary apart on October 14th. McNabb will pick them apart on November 4th, and maybe on December 16th. Farve will pick them apart on November 29th. &nbsp;Kidna will pick them apart on December 9th. And Delhomme will finish the job on December 22nd. <br /> <br /> That gives the Cowboys a 10-6 record. True, something odd will probably happen and they'll win one of the aforementioned games, but something odd will probably happen in one of the other games that will cause a loss.</blockquote> <br /> <br />Where I may be off is that it's possible that Dallas will win both Philadelphia games. My prediction above had them losing both games, but now I think they'll win one and maybe both. <br /> <br />Of course, injuries to great quarterbacks will affect this prediction, but not so much injuries to wide receivers. I think the Cowboys secondary is so bad that a great quarterback will still pick them apart, even with modest receivers. <br /> <br />But it looks to me at this point like the Cowboys are a likely NFC champ, even with a suspect secondary. <br /> <br />The wild card is that the Dallas offense looks so potent that, even with a suspect secondary, they may still be able to get in an offensive horserace with some of these teams. ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dxcomments/right-on-the-bears-well-see-about-the-rest-of-the-cowboys-schedule.htm</wfw:commentRss>
<wfw:comment> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/right-on-the-bears-well-see-about-the-rest-of-the-cowboys-schedule.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment>
</item>
<item>
<title>After 2 Games, Cowboys are winners but the plan has failed</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:37:46 -0500</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
After 2 games, the Dallas Cowboys are winning, and stand alone at the top of the NFC East, but the Big Plan and off-season changes are failing in a surprising way. Let's remember that in 2006 the Cowboys scored plenty of points and had a potent offense, but the defense collapsed in the 2nd half of ...
 ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/after-2-games-cowboys-are-winners-but-the-plan-has-failed.htm</link>
<category>Sports</category>
<dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/after-2-games-cowboys-are-winners-but-the-plan-has-failed.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/after-2-games-cowboys-are-winners-but-the-plan-has-failed.htm</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ After 2 games, the Dallas Cowboys are winning, and stand alone at the top of the NFC East, but the Big Plan and off-season changes are failing in a surprising way. <br /> <br /> Let's remember that in 2006 the Cowboys scored plenty of points and had a potent offense, but the defense collapsed in the 2nd half of the season. <br /> <br /> <blockquote>In fact, the defensive collapse in 2006 was notable. For the first half of the season, Dallas had one of the top ranked defenses. But during the 2nd half of the season, the defense collapsed. The collapse occurred concurrent with the injury to defensive end Greg Ellis, but it's hard to believe that the loss of a single player, especially a non-dominant player like Ellis, could have been responsible. <br /> <br /> What is much more likely is that a coach on his retirement tour simply didn't have the energy and creativity to make the kind of continual adjustments and changes during the season that are necessary. Once opponents had a few games worth of film on the Cowboys defense, they pretty much knew what they were going to do, and could game plan accordingly.</blockquote> <br /> So the Big Plan in the offseason was to fix the defense. A tired, empty coach was driven off and replaced by a guy with a reputation as a defensive genius (Wade Phillips). The assumption was that if the defense could be fixed, the Cowboys would have something. <br /> <br /> Coincidentally, Jason Garrett became offensive coordinator. Actually, Garrett wasn't even hired as offensive coordinator; in fact, he was hired for an undefined position, and eventually ended up as offensive coordinator after Phillips was hired as coach. <br /> <br /> Now that the recent history bit is out of the way, here is what is interesting about the Cowboys so far this year: Even though the Big Plan was to fix the defense, it appears that <em>the defense is actually much worse this year than it was last year. </em><br /> <br /> In fact, it doesn't appear that the Phillips hire has had any beneficial impact at all on the Cowboys. What <em>has</em> made a difference, however, is the new offensive coordinator. <br /> <br /> The Cowboys thus far are statistically worse than last year on defense, but stastically superior to last year on offense. <br /> <br /> The defense is so bad, in fact, that the only reason the Cowboys have won their first two games has been mistakes made by the opposing teams. <br /> <br /> What this means for the rest of the Cowboys season is ominous. They'll probably defeat the Bears, since the Bears have no other offense than their punt returner. <br /> <br /> <blockquote>The Cowboys' offense is too much even for the vaunted Bears' defense, and the Bears' quarterback is worse than Trent Green, who couldn't damage even the questionable Dallas defense. So the Bears can't compete with Dallas on either side of the ball. The only advantage Chicago has is their kick returner, but Dallas has the best punter in the league, which should for the most part negate Devon Hester's phenomenal skills.</blockquote> <br /> But a team with a good quarterback will pick the Dallas secondary apart. And that means 6 teams the Cowboys will face. <br /> <br /> Tom Brady will pick the Cowboys secondary apart on October 14th. McNabb will pick them apart on November 4th, and maybe on December 16th. Farve will pick them apart on November 29th. &nbsp;Kidna will pick them apart on December 9th. And Delhomme will finish the job on December 22nd. <br /> <br /> That gives the Cowboys a 10-6 record. True, something odd will probably happen and they'll win one of the aforementioned games, but something odd will probably happen in one of the other games that will cause a loss. <br /> <br /> So look for 10-6, which will probably give them a good enough record to win the NFC east, but they'll lose to Green Bay in the playoffs, and Green Bay will lose to New England in the Super Bowl, unless the football gods intervene on behalf of Brett Farve, which I hope they will. ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dxcomments/after-2-games-cowboys-are-winners-but-the-plan-has-failed.htm</wfw:commentRss>
<wfw:comment> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/after-2-games-cowboys-are-winners-but-the-plan-has-failed.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mavericks humiliation is almost complete</title>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Jun 2007 00:06:22 -0500</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
Well, my Dallas Mavericks' humiliation is almost complete. Remember, this is the team that won 67 games, and had one of the best regular seasons in NBA history, and could have won 70 games if they had tried. But that then lost in the first round of the playoffs. Why is the Mavericks' humiliation ...
 ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/mavericks-humiliation-is-almost-complete.htm</link>
<category></category>
<dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/mavericks-humiliation-is-almost-complete.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/mavericks-humiliation-is-almost-complete.htm</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Well, my Dallas Mavericks' humiliation is almost complete. <br /> <br />Remember, this is the team that won 67 games, and had one of the best regular seasons in NBA history, and could have won 70 games if they had tried. <br /> <br />But that then lost in the first round of the playoffs. <br /> <br />Why is the Mavericks' humiliation so great? <br /> <br />Because the Mavericks lost the <strong>losers' bracket.</strong> <br /> <br />Golden State was too much for the Mavericks in Round 1, but they weren't too much for Utah, which lost in convincing fashion to Phoenix, which was beaten by the Spurs. <br /> <br />So the Mavericks' bracket turned out to be the losers' bracket, and the Mavericks were the ultimate losers. <br /> <br />The reason the Mavericks' humiliation is not yet complete is that the Spurs are going to win the title, which means that the Mavericks had simply won the losers' bracket, they had a great chance of going to the Finals. <br /> <br />Jeez . . .  ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dxcomments/mavericks-humiliation-is-almost-complete.htm</wfw:commentRss>
<wfw:comment> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/mavericks-humiliation-is-almost-complete.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dirk is soft</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 May 2007 01:07:45 -0500</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
Write it down in 3 inch tall letters: Dirk is soft. From here on out, he is just a jump shooter. That's all. A jump shooter is is on sometimes, and off sometimes. He doesn't have the heart of a champion. I hope for his sake he isn't the MVP. It would be too embarassing for him and for all of us. ...
 ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/dirk-is-soft.htm</link>
<category></category>
<dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/dirk-is-soft.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/dirk-is-soft.htm</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Write it down in 3 inch tall letters: Dirk is soft. <br /> <br /> From here on out, he is just a jump shooter. That's all. A jump shooter is is on sometimes, and off sometimes. <br /> <br /> He doesn't have the heart of a champion. I hope for his sake he isn't the MVP. It would be too embarassing for him and for all of us. <br /> <br /> What a colossal letdown. <br /> <br /> And we're not talking about just one bad game. We're talking about a bad series. <br /> <br />Congratulations, Dirk, on a really good regular season. Enjoy looking at that big trophy for having a good regular season. <br /> <br />Get me some players with heart. ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dxcomments/dirk-is-soft.htm</wfw:commentRss>
<wfw:comment> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/dirk-is-soft.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dallas: Think Small, or sometimes don&#8217;t even think at all</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:08:59 -0500</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
Coming back to Dallas on an American Airlines flight from London last week, upon landing a promotional video for the city of Dallas begin playing on the 777's video screens. I've taken this flight many times in the past, but have never seen this video before. The video was to promote Dallas' new ...
 ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/dallas-live-okay-but-think-small.htm</link>
<category></category>
<dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/dallas-live-okay-but-think-small.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/dallas-live-okay-but-think-small.htm</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Coming back to Dallas on an American Airlines flight from London last week, upon landing a promotional video for the city of Dallas begin playing on the 777's video screens. <br /> <br /> I've taken this flight many times in the past, but have never seen this video before. <br /> <br /> The video was to promote <a href=http://www.dallascvb.com/visitors/index.php><span style="text-decoration:underline">Dallas' new public relations slogan: "Live Large, Think Big."</span></a> <br /> <br /> But when the words were pasted on the video screen, I heard titters on the plane, which reflected my reaction as well. <br /> <br /> The reason is that Dallas most definitely does NOT think big, and this is the week we've all been reminded of that. <br /> <br /> You see, Dallas, though no actions whatsoever of the its current or former elected officials, happens to be the home of one of the most storied sports franchises in the world, the Dallas Cowboys. <br /> <br /> A couple of years ago, when Cowboys owner Jerry Jones approached the city with his proposal for an incredible new sports palace, he was given little more than a rude brush-off by the city's loser mayor, Laura Miller. <br /> <br /> <blockquote>And several years before that, when the owners of the hockey and basketball franchises approached the city, they got almost the same reaction. But that arena got built somehow anyway, and it's become the centerpiece and anchor of a new urban revitalization that is going on in a former abandoned warehouse district just barely to the north of downtown.</blockquote> <br /> What Jerry wanted to build was nothing short of the most amazing sports complex in the world. It will draw not only Super Bowls, but also political conventions, basketball tournaments, probably a BCS college bowl game--in short, a true economic magnet, and an architectural wonder. <br /> <br /> It's nothing short of amazing. It will be one of the major draws in the entire nation. <br /> <span style="text-decoration:underline"><br /> </span><a href=http://stadium.dallascowboys.com/><span style="text-decoration:underline">And it's under construction, right now. But in Arlington, not Dallas.</span></a> And all it took was a half-cent sales tax increase, which Arlington voters strongly endorsed before Dallas officials had a chance to recognize the magnitude of their mistake. <br /> <br /> This week, the board of the Cotton Bowl voted to move the game from the historic Cotton Bowl stadium in downtown Dallas to the new Cowboys stadium, beginning in 2010. It was the right and the only rational decision. <br /> <br /> But it's the end of a 70-year tradition in Dallas, and it didn't have to be. It's Dallas' fault. It's Laura Miller's fault. <br /> <br /> This week begins the era of bashing Dallas Mayor Laura Miller, and she will be joked about and bashed in Dallas well after she has moved on out of office, and well after she moves on from this life. <br /> <br /> She really should move to a different state when she leaves office. The appreciation of the magnitude of her incompetence will only grow with time. <br /> <br />You want an example? <a href=http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/localnews/stories/022807dnmethomelesscenter.188b348.html>While Cotton Bowl officials were announcing their decision to leave Dallas, Mayor Laura Miller was thanking homeless people for their patience.</a> <br /> <br /><blockquote>Dallas Mayor Laura Miller thanked the several homeless people in attendance for their patience, noting that the center has been discussed and debated for the last five years.</blockquote> ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dxcomments/dallas-live-okay-but-think-small.htm</wfw:commentRss>
<wfw:comment> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/dallas-live-okay-but-think-small.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment>
</item>
<item>
<title>Holding out for Newt</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:15:32 -0500</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
Regarding the field of possible Republican Presidential nominees, put me in the camp of people who are still holding out for Newt. And so I'm encouraged by Dick Morris' column today in The Hill. The irony of the GOP field at the moment is that while most Republicans are conservatives, the two fron ...
 ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/holding-out-for-newt.htm</link>
<category>Politics</category>
<dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/holding-out-for-newt.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/holding-out-for-newt.htm</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Regarding the field of possible Republican Presidential nominees, put me in the camp of people who are still holding out for Newt. <br /> <br />And so I'm encouraged by <a href=http://thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/Comment/DickMorris/021407.html>Dick Morris' column today in <em>The Hill.</em></a> <br /> <br /><em><blockquote>The irony of the GOP field at the moment is that while most Republicans are conservatives, the two frontrunners &#8212; Rudy and McCain &#8212; are moderates. And this isn&#8217;t Nelson Rockefeller&#8217;s Republican Party anymore! Gingrich is filling a real political need and if he moves out smartly and files his paperwork, takes his announcement bows, and journeys to Iowa and New Hampshire as a candidate, he might well be a contender. </em> <br /><em></blockquote></em> <br /> <br />Morris is right. Neither Romney nor McCain nor Giuliani are capable of garnering broad conservative support. Remember that it was the South Carolina primary where Bush passed McCain in the last Republican Presidential primary race, never to look back. Ask yourselves, "Which of Romney, McCain and Giuliani are South Carolinians most likely to be fired up about?" <br /> <br />Answer: None of the above. Same is true of Texans. <br /> <br />Gingrich, despite his caricature, will trounce them all in debates. Gingrich is the sunny, optimistic one. Gingrich is the only true political intellectual in the possible field of candidates. <br /> <br />Am I concerned about Newt? Yes. I'm worried that he's not self-disciplined enough, and I worry that he can't delegate. But I'm willing to take that chance after having watched Bush masquerading as a conservative for eight years and squandering everything we have been working toward. <br /> <br />Get in, Newt. ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dxcomments/holding-out-for-newt.htm</wfw:commentRss>
<wfw:comment> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/holding-out-for-newt.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cory Doctorow&#8217;s syllabus for his class on copyright</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:27:59 -0500</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
This is a hoot: <a href=http://uscpwned.blogspot.com/2007/01/syllabus.html><strong>Here is what is apparently the syllabus for Cory Doctorow's class on copyright.</strong></a> <br /> <br />A quick perusal will suggest that the students are going to get anything BUT a balanced presentation on digital copyright issues. <br /> <br />Here's a sample: <br /> <br /><blockquote>When the computer, the network, publishing platforms, and property can all be magicked away with the Intellectual Property wand, we're all of us pwned, 0wnz0red, punkd. Our tools are turned against us, the law is tipped away from our favor.</blockquote> <br /> <br />This is what passes for a university class these days? Things have certainly changed. <br /> <br />Should a known partisan and activist on an issue be teaching a subject to students? Doesn't his activism pretty much undermine him as someone who can present an objective curriculum? <br /> <br />Oh, and he includes a link at the bottom to IPI's IP Blog, which ...
 ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/cory-doctorows-syllabus-for-his-class-on-copyright.htm</link>
<category>Free Culture Movement</category>
<dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/cory-doctorows-syllabus-for-his-class-on-copyright.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/cory-doctorows-syllabus-for-his-class-on-copyright.htm</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ This is a hoot: <a href=http://uscpwned.blogspot.com/2007/01/syllabus.html><strong>Here is what is apparently the syllabus for Cory Doctorow's class on copyright.</strong></a> <br /> <br />A quick perusal will suggest that the students are going to get anything BUT a balanced presentation on digital copyright issues. <br /> <br />Here's a sample: <br /> <br /><blockquote>When the computer, the network, publishing platforms, and property can all be magicked away with the Intellectual Property wand, we're all of us pwned, 0wnz0red, punkd. Our tools are turned against us, the law is tipped away from our favor.</blockquote> <br /> <br />This is what passes for a university class these days? Things have certainly changed. <br /> <br />Should a known partisan and activist on an issue be teaching a subject to students? Doesn't his activism pretty much undermine him as someone who can present an objective curriculum? <br /> <br />Oh, and he includes a link at the bottom to IPI's IP Blog, which has been retired and folded into this current IPI Policy Bytes blog. I guess in the final week he's going to be covering the <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=189600971"><strong>ill-informed ranters</strong></a> among us. ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dxcomments/cory-doctorows-syllabus-for-his-class-on-copyright.htm</wfw:commentRss>
<wfw:comment> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/cory-doctorows-syllabus-for-his-class-on-copyright.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment>
</item>
<item>
<title>Astonishing and disappointing pro-tax increase piece on NRO</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:29:19 -0500</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
Several of us will have comments on this later, but for now just drawing your attention to <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=YmE4M2JjODc2MWJkMzBiMjJhYjg0YmQwNDY5ZDkyOGI="><strong>an astonishing and disappointing piece in National Review last week where Carrie Lukas insists that tax increases have to be "on the table" in Social Security discussions.</strong></a> <br /> <br />With this, I'm afraid Carrie has put herself squarely in the camp of those who have bought in to the idea that large tax increases are inevitable, and if taxes have to go up, by golly we want to be the ones who design them. <br /> <br />She also makes the unfortunate mistake of criticizing Mike Pence, one of our movement's few remaining principled heroes. Carrie, we don't have any to spare right now. There are better targets for you. <br /> <br />The White House has been feeding this line for months now to useful idiots, and I'm saddened to see Carrie among them.  ...
 ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/astonishing-and-disappointing-pro-tax-carrie-lukas-piece-on-nro.htm</link>
<category>Social Security</category>
<dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/astonishing-and-disappointing-pro-tax-carrie-lukas-piece-on-nro.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/astonishing-and-disappointing-pro-tax-carrie-lukas-piece-on-nro.htm</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Several of us will have comments on this later, but for now just drawing your attention to <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=YmE4M2JjODc2MWJkMzBiMjJhYjg0YmQwNDY5ZDkyOGI="><strong><span style="text-decoration:underline">an astonishing and disappointing piece in National Review last week where Carrie Lukas insists that tax increases have to be "on the table" in Social Security discussions.</span></strong></a> <br /> <br /> With this, I'm afraid Carrie has put herself squarely in the camp of those who have bought in to the idea that large tax increases are inevitable, and if taxes have to go up, by golly we want to be the ones who design them. <br /> <br /> She also makes the unfortunate mistake of criticizing Mike Pence, one of our movement's few remaining principled heroes. Carrie, we don't have any to spare right now. There are better targets for you. <br /> <br /> The White House has been feeding this line for months now to useful idiots, and I'm saddened to see Carrie among them. I can't help the observation that it appears that some folks wanted Pence taken on, but they didn't have the you-know-whats to do it themselves, so they got a girl to do it for them. <br /> <br /> <blockquote>"Useful idiots" is, of course, a historical reference, not a commentary on Carrie's or anyone's particular intelligence. It conjures up the image of one who is naïve, foolish, or in willful denial, and that is being cynically used by another party to further that party's political goals.</blockquote> <br /> <br /> It's important to note that people like Lukas claim that they are not in favor of tax increases, but that tax increases must be acceptable subjects of discussion. But please notice that the arguments they are making are already the very arguments for tax increases. <br /> <br /> They also seem to have this silly idea that there won't be a NET tax increase. See, you'll raise the cap but lower the tax rate, and somehow it will all work out to NOT be a NET tax increase. But there isn't any point in playing with the tax details at all if the goal isn't an increase in revenue. The only reason to make any tax changes related to Social Security is to help pay for the solution with additional revenues. It is, by definition, an increase in taxes that is being discussed, and it is opening the door to such tax increases that people like Carrie are championing. <br /> <br /> Kudos to Mike Pence, and shame on those who want to open the door to tax increases. <br /> <br /> Sadly, people continue to buy into this idea even though it's really clear that what started off as a noble campaign for transforming Social Security into a system of ownership and wealth creation has, through Executive Branch mismanagement, devolved into a discussion of tax increases and benefit cuts. It's the ownership that is now the only thing "off the table." <br /> <blockquote>Of course, IPI predicted that was exactly what would happen. In fact, not only have Peter Ferrara and Larry Hunter been predicting this for years, but I personally predicted this in front of Carrie. Carrie and I both spoke on the same Social Security reform panel at the 2005 CPAC, and this was the subject of my speech.</blockquote> <br /> <br /> Why smart folks like Carrie don't get it is beyond me, but the fact remains that <strong>a bad deal is worse than no deal on Social Security.</strong> <br /> <br /> Tax increases are the definition of a bad deal, but also, any compromise that takes us further away from personal accounts and ownership is also a bad deal. You don't get to tax reform by adding on new credits, exclusions and deductions, and you don't get to personal accounts by raising taxes and cutting benefits. <br /> <br /> You want to make the Social Security problem even worse than it is now? Raise marginal taxes and slow down the economy, which will reduce the amount of payroll taxes that would otherwise be paid into the system. Now THERE is a Social Security disaster.  ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dxcomments/astonishing-and-disappointing-pro-tax-carrie-lukas-piece-on-nro.htm</wfw:commentRss>
<wfw:comment> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/astonishing-and-disappointing-pro-tax-carrie-lukas-piece-on-nro.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment>
</item>
<item>
<title>Antiwar protesters deface U.S. Capitol building</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 09:58:43 -0500</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
See, this is how you bring disrepute on your cause. It's not enough to protest and get news coverage. You have to go and <a href=http://www.hillnews.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/012507/protesters.html><strong>spray paint the U.S. Capitol building.</strong></a> <br /> <br /><blockquote>Approximately 300 protesters were allowed to take the steps and began to spray paint "anarchist symbols" and phrase such as "Our capitol building" and "you can&#8217;t stop us" around the area, the source said. <br /> <br />Morse responded to these claims in an e-mail Sunday afternoon explaining that the protesters were seeking confrontation with the police.</blockquote> <br />So you're not just looking to make a statement. You're looking for a confrontation, and you're to do vandalism against the government at the expense of U.S. taxpayers. ...
 ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/antiwar-protesters-deface-u.s.-capitol-building.htm</link>
<category>Politics</category>
<dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/antiwar-protesters-deface-u.s.-capitol-building.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/antiwar-protesters-deface-u.s.-capitol-building.htm</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ See, this is how you bring disrepute on your cause. It's not enough to protest and get news coverage. You have to go and <a href=http://www.hillnews.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/012507/protesters.html><strong><span style="text-decoration:underline">spray paint the U.S. Capitol building.</span></strong></a> <br /> <br /> <blockquote>Approximately 300 protesters were allowed to take the steps and began to spray paint "anarchist symbols" and phrase such as "Our capitol building" and "you can&#8217;t stop us" around the area, the source said. <br /> <br /> Morse responded to these claims in an e-mail Sunday afternoon explaining that the protesters were seeking confrontation with the police.</blockquote> <br /> So you're not just looking to make a statement. You're looking for a confrontation, and you're to do vandalism against the government at the expense of U.S. taxpayers. ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dxcomments/antiwar-protesters-deface-u.s.-capitol-building.htm</wfw:commentRss>
<wfw:comment> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/antiwar-protesters-deface-u.s.-capitol-building.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;Is it in you,&quot;  Bill?</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:14:41 -0500</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
Following up on the joyous news thata Bill Parcells has resigned as Cowboys coach (and retired for the 4th time) . . . Just a few short weeks ago Parcells cut a commercial for Gatorade where he is the toll booth attendent, and he is talking about how how dedicated you have to be to make the grade, ...
 ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/is-it-in-you--bill.htm</link>
<category></category>
<dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/is-it-in-you--bill.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/is-it-in-you--bill.htm</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Following up on the joyous news thata Bill Parcells has resigned as Cowboys coach (and retired for the 4th time) . . .  <br /> <br />Just a few short weeks ago Parcells cut a commercial for Gatorade where he is the toll booth attendent, and he is talking about how how dedicated you have to be to make the grade, etc. <br /> <br />At the end of the commercial, Parcells in his Cowboys jacket is looking at a bus full of players and asks "Is it in you?" <br /> <br />Well, apparently it wasn't in Bill. ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dxcomments/is-it-in-you--bill.htm</wfw:commentRss>
<wfw:comment> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/is-it-in-you--bill.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thrilled that Parcells is leaving Dallas</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:22:14 -0500</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
Thrilled, Thrilled, Thrilled, THRILLED that Bill Parcells is leaving Dallas. The 2006 Cowboys underperformed their talent, and that falls at the feet of the coaching staff. Assistant coaches are fleeing Dallas and performing better with other teams because Parcells won't let them coach. Don't ...
 ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/thrilled-that-parcells-is-leaving-dallas.htm</link>
<category></category>
<dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/thrilled-that-parcells-is-leaving-dallas.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/thrilled-that-parcells-is-leaving-dallas.htm</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Thrilled,  <br /> <br />Thrilled, <br /> <br />Thrilled, <br /> <br />THRILLED that Bill Parcells is leaving Dallas. <br /> <br />The 2006 Cowboys underperformed their talent, and that falls at the feet of the coaching staff. <br /> <br />Assistant coaches are fleeing Dallas and performing better with other teams because Parcells won't let them coach. <br /> <br />Don't let the door hit you on the way out, Bill. ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dxcomments/thrilled-that-parcells-is-leaving-dallas.htm</wfw:commentRss>
<wfw:comment> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/thrilled-that-parcells-is-leaving-dallas.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment>
</item>
<item>
<title>Documenting the FiOS rollout-4</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:24:45 -0500</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
Nice finish, Verizon. <br /> <br /><a href="http://www.policybytes.org/blog/PolicyBytes.nsf/archive?openview&amp;title=Verizon+FiOS&amp;sort=I&amp;type=cat&amp;cat=Technology&amp;cat2=Broadband&amp;cat3=Verizon+FiOS"><strong>In several previous blog entries I've been documenting the details of the Verizon FiOS rollout in my rural town.</strong></a> <br /> <br />We've been living with the service for several weeks now, and I'm planning to describe in detail how pleased we are with the service and bandwidth. <br /> <br />But this entry is simply meant to point out what I think is true class on the part of Verizon. <br /> <br />For the last two years, as I have spoken and given testimony on the importance of states lowering barriers to video competition, time and time again opponents have talked about the need for local control of the franchise process in order to protect the interests of their citizens.  ...
 ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/documenting-the-fios-rollout-4.htm</link>
<category>Verizon FiOS</category>
<dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/documenting-the-fios-rollout-4.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/documenting-the-fios-rollout-4.htm</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Nice finish, Verizon. <br /> <span style="text-decoration:underline"><br /> </span><a href="http://www.policybytes.org/blog/PolicyBytes.nsf/archive?openview&amp;title=Verizon+FiOS&amp;sort=I&amp;type=cat&amp;cat=Technology&amp;cat2=Broadband&amp;cat3=Verizon+FiOS"><strong><span style="text-decoration:underline">In several previous blog entries I've been documenting the details of the Verizon FiOS rollout in my rural town.</span></strong></a> <br /> <br /> We've been living with the service for several weeks now, and I'm planning to describe in detail how pleased we are with the service and bandwidth. <br /> <br /> But this entry is simply meant to point out what I think is true class on the part of Verizon. <br /> <br /> For the last two years, as I have spoken and given testimony on the importance of states lowering barriers to video competition, time and time again opponents have talked about the need for local control of the franchise process in order to protect the interests of their citizens. They have talked about how "utility companies" dig up sidewalks, yards and shrubbery and leave things a mess afterwards. <br /> <br /> Now, I didn't ever buy that as a reason to maintain local franchise authority, but as a homeowner I certainly do appreciate the potential for damage to a valuable landscape job. In fact, my local water company, <a href=http://www.bartonvillewater.com/><strong><span style="text-decoration:underline">Bartonville Water Supply</span></strong></a>, has a pattern of every couple of years digging up part of my road frontage to repair a leaky water pipe, and tearing up tree roots, etc. They never smooth over the soil after they are finished. They leave my road frontage a mess, frankly, and I have lost &nbsp;2 mature trees in the last several years to destroyed roots at the hands of Bartonville Water Supply. <br /> <br /> Which takes me back to Verizon. I've documented <a href="http://www.policybytes.org/blog/PolicyBytes.nsf/dx/documenting-the-fios-rollout-1.htm"><strong>the trenching that was necessary to get the fiber optic cable to my house. </strong></a><br /> <br /> Well, a couple of weeks after installation, I'm walking to the mailbox after work and I see that someone from Verizon has come behind the trench work laid some replacement sod to patch up the damage left behind by the trenchwork. <br /> <br /> I was very impressed. That's how you finish a job. You try your best to leave your customer's property the way you found it, or to take reasonable steps to fix what you had to destroy. <br /> <br /> Good show, Verizon. Take a lesson, Bartonville Water Supply. ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dxcomments/documenting-the-fios-rollout-4.htm</wfw:commentRss>
<wfw:comment> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/documenting-the-fios-rollout-4.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment>
</item>
<item>
<title>Found: A successful anti-spam tool for Lotus Domino</title>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:31:27 -0500</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
One of my real frustrations in life is that I have learned that you usually cannot trust technology product reviews published by magazines and major websites. I can't count how many times I have read a raving review of something on CNET or elsewhere, purchased it, and then found that the product wa ...
 ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/found-a-successful-anti-spam-tool-for-lotus-domino.htm</link>
<category>Lotus Notes/Domino</category>
<dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/found-a-successful-anti-spam-tool-for-lotus-domino.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/found-a-successful-anti-spam-tool-for-lotus-domino.htm</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ One of my real frustrations in life is that I have learned that you usually cannot trust technology product reviews published by magazines and major websites. <br /> <br />I can't count how many times I have read a raving review of something on CNET or elsewhere, purchased it, and then found that the product was complete garbage. After hours of struggling with it, I would go on-line and consult bulletin boards and user groups and find that everyone was having the very same problem I was having. In other words, the product was bad, and it was known to be bad, but that didn't stop the reviewer from writing a raving review. <br /> <br />I've come to believe that most product reviews are written straight off of the manufacturer's press release, and that the reviewer never did much more than take it out of the box. <br /> <br />So, when I come upon a product or solution that really works, I blog about it. <a href="http://gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/praise-for-emcdantz-retrospect-7.5-professional-full-version.htm">Here's a past example where I was so happy and relieved to have finally found a solution that worked that I had to tell people about it.</a> <br /> <br />So, today, another success story related to anti-spam software. <br /> <br />At my office we run a Lotus Domino mail server, which we're very happy with. Like most companies, we are inundated with spam. Just before Christmas I estimated that I was receiving about 10 spam emails to every 1 genuine email. <br /> <br />And this was with using blacklists and anti-relay protections that are built into Domino. <br /> <br />We were also running Symantec Mail Security (SMS) for Domino version 4, which was almost a waste of time. While it identified some spam, it identified only about 20% of the spam that arrived on our server. I was keenly disappointed with SMS for Domino version 4. <br /> <br />Symantec also offers a product called Premium Antispam, which is a subscription service using the Brightmail system. I got a trial license for Symantec Premium Antispam and loaded it into SMS for Domino version 4, and it did absolutely nothing. There was no detectable change or improvement; so much so that I wondered if the two products actually worked together, though SMS for Domino version 4 accepted the license file for Symantec Premium Antispam. <br /> <br />So no improvement. <br /> <br />I decided, however, to try upgrading to SMS for Domino version 5, which claimed several improvements. I installed SMS for Domino version 5 overtop of the existing SMS for Domino version 4, which went seamlessly. I then added the Symantec Premium Antispam trial license into SMS for Domino version 5. <br /> <br />The results have been fantastic, so much so that users have been commenting on how little email they are receiving. It's safe to say that the combination of SMS for Domino version 5 and Symantec Premium Antispam is catching 95% of all our spam, with almost no false positives. Of course the whitelist we had built with SMS for Domino version 4 carried over to the version 5 installation, so the email we want is getting through, and almost all of the email we don't want is being routed by rules to the clients' Junk Mail folder, where it can be scanned at leisure or just automatically deleted, depending on the users' preferences. <br /> <br />So this is a rave review from a real-world user for the combination of Symantec Mail Security for Domino version 5 and Symantec Premium Antispam. ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dxcomments/found-a-successful-anti-spam-tool-for-lotus-domino.htm</wfw:commentRss>
<wfw:comment> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/found-a-successful-anti-spam-tool-for-lotus-domino.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment>
</item>
<item>
<title>Boehner is disqualified</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:32:55 -0500</pubDate>
<description>
<![CDATA[ 
Following up on <a href="http://policybytes.org/blog/PolicyBytes.nsf/dx/no-good-deed-goes-unpunished-for-republicans-who-stand-against-earmarks.htm"><strong>Barry Aarons' blog posting here</strong></a>, and the WSJ editorial, we've just learned what we needed to know about Boehner, and he is disqualified from leading a House Republican caucus that values integrity and principle. <br /> <br /> Screwing Jeff Flake and rewarding Jerry Lewis tells you everything. <br /> <br /> I look forward to the day that Boehner and <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,183845,00.html"><strong><span style="text-decoration:underline">his fake tan and his cigs are spending all their time out on the links</span></strong></a> and no longer have anything to do with conservative leadership. And any conservative organization that gives Boehner any props or a speaking forum is aiding and abetting a loser. ...
 ]]>
</description>
<link>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/boehner-is-disqualified.htm</link>
<category>Politics</category>
<dc:creator>Tom Giovanetti</dc:creator>
<comments>http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/boehner-is-disqualified.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</comments>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/boehner-is-disqualified.htm</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Following up on <a href="http://policybytes.org/blog/PolicyBytes.nsf/dx/no-good-deed-goes-unpunished-for-republicans-who-stand-against-earmarks.htm"><strong>Barry Aarons' blog posting here</strong></a>, and the WSJ editorial, we've just learned what we needed to know about Boehner, and he is disqualified from leading a House Republican caucus that values integrity and principle. <br /> <br /> Screwing Jeff Flake and rewarding Jerry Lewis tells you everything. <br /> <br /> I look forward to the day that Boehner and <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,183845,00.html"><strong><span style="text-decoration:underline">his fake tan and his cigs are spending all their time out on the links</span></strong></a> and no longer have anything to do with conservative leadership. And any conservative organization that gives Boehner any props or a speaking forum is aiding and abetting a loser. ]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dxcomments/boehner-is-disqualified.htm</wfw:commentRss>
<wfw:comment> http://www.gioblog.com/blog/GioBlog.nsf/dx/boehner-is-disqualified.htm?opendocument&amp;comments</wfw:comment>
</item>
</channel></rss>
